Electric cars and the MOT
Electric cars fail the MOT more often than petrol cars of the same age. Tyres are why.
Data updated
Quick answer
Electric cars need an MOT on the same schedule as any car, with no emissions test because there is no exhaust. Across 489,247 DVSA tests of 51 electric models, EVs aged 3 to 5 pass 86.7% of tests against 89.9% for petrol and diesel cars of the same age. The gap is tyres and suspension: weight and instant torque wear both faster.
The expectation is reasonable. No engine, no exhaust, no emissions test, a fraction of the moving parts — an electric car ought to sail through. The test data says otherwise, and the reason is not a fault in the cars so much as a fact about them: they are several hundred kilograms heavier than the petrol cars they replace, and they deliver all of their torque the instant the pedal moves.
Almost every electric car on the road is under six years old, so every figure here compares them with petrol and diesel cars of the same age — recent launches like the Ford Puma and Toyota Yaris Cross — rather than with the national fleet. Against the whole fleet, EVs look excellent, because rust and broken springs are diseases of age. That comparison would be flattering and meaningless.
The finding
Same age, fewer parts, more failures
- Electric cars, 3–5 years old
- 86.7%
- Petrol and diesel, 3–5 years old
- 89.9%
pass rate across 397,108 tests of 51 models
pass rate across 309,065 tests of 44 recent-launch models
A gap of 3.2 percentage points, the wrong way. For a group of cars that skips the test most people worry about, that is a substantial finding, and it turns entirely on two component groups.
What fails
Where the failures come from
Tyre items are recorded 92 times per 100 failed electric-car tests, against 57 for same-age petrol cars. Suspension runs at 3.1 times the rate. Brakes go the other way: 10 against 29, because regenerative braking means the friction brakes barely work. Engine and emissions items, a steady source of failures on petrol and diesel cars, do not exist.
- Tyres
- 92.557.0
- Suspension
- 28.59.3
- Lamps
- 12.710.5
- Wipers and screen
- 11.418.7
- Brakes
- 10.428.6
- Tyre pressure monitoring
- 3.34.3
- Number plate
- 2.12.4
- Engine and emissions
- 0.14.2
- Corrosion
- 0.11.0
Items recorded per 100 failed tests. A failed test often lists several items, so these are not percentages of tests and can exceed 100. The measure is the same on both sides.
DVSA recorded wording
The items themselves
The eight items recorded most often on failed electric-car tests, with the same item’s frequency on same-age petrol and diesel cars alongside. Each links to what the wording means and what puts it right.
| Item | Electric | Petrol/diesel |
|---|---|---|
| A tyre seriously damaged | 36.5 | 29.0 |
| A tyre cords visible or damaged | 28.6 | 10.0 |
| Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 25.6 | 16.4 |
| A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 20.4 | 2.3 |
| Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 7.3 | 11.1 |
| The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen | 3.8 | 7.3 |
| A tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative | 3.3 | 4.3 |
Per 100 failed tests. Explanations: tyre damaged, cords exposed, tread depth, suspension bush worn, brake disc worn or pitted.
All 43 ranked
Every electric car ranked by MOT pass rate
Pass rate at 3 to 5 years old, which is where nearly every electric car’s tests sit, so it is a like-for-like ordering. Models need at least 1,000 tests in that age band to appear. Each links to its full file, with its own failure and advisory record.
| # | Model | Pass rate | vs petrol | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaguar I-Pace | 92.0% | +2.1 | 17,865 |
| 2 | Smart EQ Fortwo | 91.8% | +1.9 | 1,552 |
| 3 | Volkswagen E-Up | 91.6% | +1.7 | 2,463 |
| 4 | Nissan Ariya | 91.2% | +1.3 | 1,337 |
| 5 | Porsche Taycan | 91.1% | +1.2 | 7,874 |
| 6 | Hyundai Ioniq 5 | 91.1% | +1.2 | 7,996 |
| 7 | Porsche Taycan 4S Cross Turismo | 91.0% | +1.1 | 1,246 |
| 8 | Cupra Born | 90.6% | +0.7 | 4,478 |
| 9 | Audi E-Tron | 90.1% | +0.2 | 18,189 |
| 10 | Mazda MX-30 | 89.9% | +0.0 | 2,616 |
| 11 | Honda E | 89.8% | −0.1 | 1,905 |
| 12 | Mercedes-Benz Eqa | 89.7% | −0.2 | 9,423 |
| 13 | Ford Mustang Mach-E | 89.7% | −0.2 | 6,838 |
| 14 | Volvo C40 | 89.6% | −0.3 | 1,675 |
| 15 | Kia EV6 | 89.1% | −0.8 | 5,170 |
| 16 | Volkswagen ID3 | 89.0% | −0.9 | 25,533 |
| 17 | Nissan Leaf | 88.6% | −1.3 | 25,257 |
| 18 | Volkswagen ID5 | 87.8% | −2.1 | 2,681 |
| 19 | Volkswagen ID4 | 87.8% | −2.1 | 10,600 |
| 20 | Audi Q4 E-Tron | 87.6% | −2.3 | 10,169 |
| 21 | Volkswagen E-Golf | 87.5% | −2.4 | 2,601 |
| 22 | MG 4 | 87.5% | −2.4 | 2,817 |
| 23 | Skoda Enyaq | 87.3% | −2.6 | 8,315 |
| 24 | Mercedes-Benz Eqv | 87.3% | −2.6 | 1,118 |
| 25 | Renault Zoe | 86.9% | −3.0 | 17,447 |
| 26 | Polestar 2 | 86.9% | −3.0 | 12,223 |
| 27 | BMW IX | 85.8% | −4.1 | 5,524 |
| 28 | BMW IX3 | 85.4% | −4.5 | 9,278 |
| 29 | Mercedes-Benz Eqb | 85.3% | −4.6 | 2,633 |
| 30 | Smart EQ Forfour | 85.3% | −4.6 | 1,756 |
| 31 | Tesla Model 3 | 84.7% | −5.2 | 76,325 |
| 32 | Fiat 500E | 84.5% | −5.4 | 4,087 |
| 33 | MG 5 | 84.1% | −5.8 | 14,321 |
| 34 | Tesla Model Y | 83.8% | −6.1 | 32,483 |
| 35 | BMW I4 | 83.7% | −6.2 | 6,539 |
| 36 | Mercedes-Benz Eqc | 83.5% | −6.4 | 12,209 |
| 37 | Fiat 500E LA Prima | 82.5% | −7.4 | 2,991 |
| 38 | Vauxhall Vivaro-E | 81.7% | −8.2 | 1,517 |
| 39 | Citroen E-C4 | 81.6% | −8.3 | 4,467 |
| 40 | Vauxhall Combo-E | 80.3% | −9.6 | 1,163 |
| 41 | Tesla Model X | 79.1% | −10.8 | 1,505 |
| 42 | Nissan E-NV200 | 74.9% | −15.0 | 4,289 |
| 43 | Maxus E Deliver 3 | 71.5% | −18.4 | 1,704 |
“vs petrol” is the gap in percentage points to the 89.9% same-age petrol and diesel baseline.
Too few tests to rank
8 more electric models have a page but fewer than 1,000 tests at 3 to 5 years, so a pass rate would be too noisy to order against the others.
- Tesla Model S · 953
- Mercedes-Benz Eqe · 530
- Toyota BZ4X · 370
- Mercedes-Benz Eqs · 779
- Mercedes-Benz Evito · 633
- Porsche Taycan 4 Cross Turismo · 592
- Audi RS E-Tron GT · 556
- Genesis GV60 · 516
What the test cannot tell you
The MOT does not test the battery
The tester looks for visibly damaged or insecure high-voltage cabling. That is the extent of it. There is no capacity test, no range test, no check on charging. A used electric car with a fresh MOT pass may have lost a meaningful share of its battery capacity and the certificate will not say so.
For a used purchase, treat the MOT record as evidence about tyres, suspension and how the car has been kept, and get the battery assessed separately. The electric car MOT guide sets out exactly what is and is not inspected.
Read further
Guides
How this was worked out
Method and limits
Source: the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, under the Open Government Licence, class 4 initial tests only. A model counts as electric when at least 90% of its tests were recorded against an electric fuel code. That excludes models sold in both electric and hybrid or petrol forms — the BMW i3 with its range extender, the Kia Niro, the Hyundai Kona — because their electric cars’ results cannot be separated from the rest.
The comparison group is petrol and diesel models with at least 85% of their tests in the 3–5 year band, which in practice means models launched in the last few years. Pass rates for both groups are taken inside that band only. The rest of the site ranks models on a rate standardised across all ages; electric cars cannot have one, because there are no fifteen-year-old examples to standardise against.
Failure items are counted per 100 failed tests rather than as a share of tests, because a failed test often lists several items and the per-test share would understate components — tyres above all — that fail in pairs. The measure is identical on both sides.
The adjustment handles age. It does not handle who buys these cars or how they are driven and maintained, and an MOT is a legal minimum checked on one day, not a reliability record. A pass rate describes a fleet, not the car in front of you.
Common questions
- Do electric cars need an MOT?
- Yes, on exactly the same schedule as any car: a first test when the car turns three, then every year. There is no exemption for electric vehicles. The one procedural difference is that there is no emissions test, because there is no exhaust. Everything else — tyres, brakes, suspension, steering, lights, structure — is inspected as normal.
- Do electric cars pass the MOT more often than petrol cars?
- No. At 3 to 5 years old, electric cars pass 86.7% of tests and petrol and diesel cars of the same age pass 89.9%, so electric cars fail 3.2 percentage points more often. That is despite having no emissions test and far fewer moving parts. The difference is almost entirely tyres and suspension.
- What do electric cars fail the MOT on?
- Tyres, overwhelmingly. Tyre items are recorded 92 times per 100 failed electric-car tests against 57 for same-age petrol cars. Suspension wear runs at about 3 times the rate. Both follow from weight and instant torque: a heavier car with full torque from a standstill scrubs tread faster, damages sidewalls more easily and works its suspension bushes harder.
- Does the MOT test the battery?
- No. The MOT does not measure battery health, range, charging performance or the high-voltage system's condition beyond a visual check for damaged or insecure cabling. A fresh MOT pass on a used electric car tells you nothing about how much capacity the battery has left, so it should never stand in for a battery health report when buying.
- Which electric car has the best MOT pass rate?
- The Jaguar I-Pace, at 92.0% of tests passed at 3 to 5 years old, from 17,865 tests. The lowest among cars is the Tesla Model X at 79.1%. Electric vans do worst of all — the Maxus E Deliver 3 passes 71.5% — because vans are worked hard regardless of what powers them.
- Why compare electric cars only with cars of the same age?
- Because almost every electric car on the road is under six years old, and the failures that dominate older cars — corrosion, broken springs, rusted brake pipes — are diseases of age. Set an electric fleet against the whole national fleet and it looks superb for reasons that have nothing to do with being electric. Comparing it with recent-launch petrol and diesel models of the same age is the only comparison that isolates the effect of the powertrain.
- Why do electric cars do better on brakes?
- Regenerative braking slows the car through the motor, so the friction brakes are used far less and pads barely wear. Brake items are recorded at roughly a third of the rate seen on same-age petrol cars. The trade-off is that discs which are rarely used can corrode and pit from disuse, which appears as an advisory rather than a failure on a large share of electric-car tests.
Analysis built from DVSA data of