Model reliability file
Volvo C40 MOT pass rate & common failures
From 1,783 recorded MOT tests of the Volvo C40, published by DVSA.
Data updated
Quick answer
Across 1,783 MOT tests, 89.8% of Volvo C40 tests ended in a pass. This figure is not adjusted for age or mileage, so it is not a reliability ranking: the Volvo C40 fleet does not yet cover a wide enough spread of ages and distances to compare it fairly against other models. Its most commonly recorded failure is tyre seriously damaged, which appears in 39.1% of failed tests. Cars of this model average 29,170 miles on the odometer when tested.
At a glance
Recorded pass rate
We are not publishing a ranking for the C40. The examples tested do not cover a wide enough spread of ages and mileages to compare it fairly, and an unadjusted pass rate mostly sorts models by how recently they were bought rather than how well they were built. The failure and advisory patterns below come from the same 1,783 tests and are worth reading on their own terms.
DVSA recorded wording
Most common failure items
Share of failed Volvo C40 tests in which each item was recorded. One failed test often lists several items, so these do not sum to 100%.
- 1.A tyre seriously damaged39.1%
63 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 2.A tyre seriously damaged27.3%
44 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 3.A tyre cords visible or damaged19.9%
32 occurrencesTyre ply or cord exposed, or the casing separating explained
- 4.Tyres on the same axle or on twin wheels are different sizes9.9%
16 occurrencesTyres of different sizes or construction on the same axle explained
- 5.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements9.3%
15 occurrencesTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 6.Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen6.2%
10 occurrencesWiper or washer not working properly explained
- 7.A tyre seriously damaged5.6%
9 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 8.A tyre has a lump, bulge or tear caused by separation or partial failure of its structure. This includes any lifting of the tread rubber3.7%
6 occurrencesTyre ply or cord exposed, or the casing separating explained
- 9.A tyre cords visible or damaged2.5%
4 occurrencesTyre ply or cord exposed, or the casing separating explained
- 10.A tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative1.2%
2 occurrencesTyre pressure monitoring system inoperative explained
Warnings without a failure
Most common advisories
Share of all Volvo C40 tests carrying each advisory. The denominator differs from the failure list above because an advisory can be issued on a car that passed.
- 1.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements22.7%
- 2.A tyre seriously damaged6.8%
- 3.A tyre seriously damaged4.9%
- 4.Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt4.5%
80 tests
- 5.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements3.9%
- 6.Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured3.4%
- 7.Nail in tyre3.4%
60 tests
- 8.A tyre seriously damaged3.1%
What gets tested
The C40 fleet
- Average mileage recorded at test
- 29,170
- Fuel mix of tested cars
- Electric100.0%
Across examples of every age, so this is a description of the fleet rather than an annual figure.
Trim names grouped into this model (5)
Recorded exactly as DVSA holds them. Trim-level names are rolled up so one model is not split across a dozen thin pages.
- C40 + RECHARGE EV
- C40 + RECHARGE TWIN EV AWD
- C40 CORE RECHARGE EV
- C40 PRO RECHARGE TWIN EV AWD
- C40 ULTIMATE RECHARGE EV
Check a specific Volvo C40
A model average tells you the pattern. Its own MOT record tells you the car.
Compare within the range
Other Volvo models
- Volvo XC60 — 79.1% adjusted
- Volvo V40 — 67.4% adjusted
- Volvo XC40 — 90.0% unadjusted
- Volvo XC90 — 77.6% adjusted
- Volvo V60 — 78.3% adjusted
- Volvo V70 — 63.8% unadjusted
- All Volvo models
Common questions
- How reliable is the Volvo C40 compared with other cars?
- We do not publish a comparison for the Volvo C40, because the cars of this model that have been tested do not cover a wide enough range of ages and mileages. Its raw pass rate is 89.8% across 1,783 tests, but comparing a raw rate between models mostly ranks them by how new they are rather than how good they are. The failure and advisory patterns further down the page are still drawn from real tests and are worth reading.
- What is the most common MOT failure on a Volvo C40?
- The item recorded most often is "A tyre seriously damaged", which appears in 39.1% of failed Volvo C40 tests. Because one failed test can list several items, these shares do not add up to 100%.
- What do testers most often warn about on a Volvo C40?
- The most common advisory is "Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements", noted on 22.7% of all Volvo C40 tests. An advisory is not a failure: it flags something that will likely need attention before the next test.
- What mileage does a Volvo C40 usually have at its MOT?
- The average odometer reading recorded at test is 29,170 miles. This is the mileage across all tested examples of every age, not an annual figure, so treat it as a description of the fleet rather than a target for one car.
How this was worked out
Method and limits
Figures come from the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, published under the Open Government Licence. Only class 4 initial tests are counted: retests are excluded so a car appears once, and abandoned tests are excluded entirely. No adjusted rate is shown because this model's tested examples do not cover enough of the national age and mileage range for standardisation to mean anything.
An MOT measures whether a car met a legal standard on the day. It is not a breakdown record, a service history or a running-cost estimate, and a pass rate is a property of a fleet rather than a prediction about one car.
Further reading