The MOT Files

MOT defect file

Suspension joint dust cover missing or split

Last updated

Quick answer

The small rubber cap sealing a suspension ball joint has split or gone altogether. The joint beneath it is usually still tight — the cover is what keeps it that way, which is why a missing one is a failure in its own right.

Typical cost
£90–£280
DIY viability
Possible with care

What you might notice

  • Nothing at all from the driver's seat in the great majority of cases — this is a ramp find, and the failure sheet is usually the first anyone hears of it
  • A split, collapsed or completely absent rubber cap on the ball joint at the outer end of a lower arm, or at the top of a strut, visible with the wheel on full lock
  • Grease weeping down the side of the joint housing, or a bright, washed-clean joint where the grease has long since gone
  • Later on, once contamination has done its work, a knock over bumps and a clunk on lock as the joint itself starts to move

What causes it

  • Age. It is thin rubber a few inches above the road, and a decade of heat, ozone, salt and grit is enough on its own
  • Stones and road debris punching through, usually on the leading face of the joint
  • A pressure washer or steam lance aimed straight at the joint, which lifts the lip of the cover off its seat and can blow the grease out with it
  • A ball joint separated with a fork-type splitter during earlier work, which tears the cover almost every time
  • Corrosion of the metal ring that clamps the cover onto the joint housing, so it works loose and falls off

Advisory or failure?

Dust covers are graded in two steps and the line between them is function rather than appearance. A suspension joint dust cover that is severely deteriorated — perished and cracked, but still keeping dirt out — is a minor defect, so the car passes with it noted, and lesser deterioration is often recorded as an advisory instead. A dust cover that is missing, or damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, is a major defect and a failure. That is the whole rule, and it bites whether or not the joint underneath has any play in it at all. The joint is assessed separately in the same part of the test: a suspension pin, bush, joint or bearing that is excessively worn is a major defect, and one likely to become detached is dangerous. Wear there is measured rather than judged — more than 2mm of play on a 12mm pin, 3mm on a 25mm pin, or 10% of the diameter on anything larger. So a missing cover and a worn joint are two different defects, and the first is what stops you collecting the second.

Can you fix it yourself?

Possible with care

Checking is the genuinely useful thing you can do yourself and it takes five minutes: turn the wheel to full lock, shine a torch at the outer end of the lower arm and look for a rubber cap that is split, collapsed or simply not there. Do that each autumn and you will find these before a tester does. The repair is another matter, because on most modern cars the cover is not sold on its own — the joint is sealed for life, so you replace the joint, or more often the complete arm it is pressed into. That is a realistic driveway job with axle stands, a torque wrench and a proper ball joint splitter rather than a fork, which destroys the cover of whatever it touches. The usual two rules apply as they do to any arm job: bolts passing through rubber bushes get their final tightening at normal ride height rather than with the car hanging on stands, and a four-wheel alignment afterwards is part of the work. Universal split-and-clip dust covers are sold, but a tester is entitled to judge whether one is actually sealing, and most are not worth the bother.

What it costs

The part costs almost nothing here; what you are buying is access. Where a dust cover or a ball joint is available separately — more common at the rear, on older cars, and on anything with a bolt-in joint — the part is £8 to £40 and the work about an hour, so £90 to £150 fitted. On most modern front suspensions the joint is integral to the lower arm, so the honest quote is a complete arm at £45 to £120 in parts with an hour and a half of labour, plus four-wheel alignment at £40 to £70, landing at £180 to £280. Press-in joints sit between the two: cheap as a part, but they need a press or a proper puller, so labour is what you pay for. If both sides have gone, ask for a price on the pair, because the alignment is shared and only needs doing once.

What happens if you ignore it

Nothing happens for a while, and that is exactly the problem. The cover is a preventive part: it holds a small charge of grease around a hardened ball and socket and keeps water, salt and grit away from it. Once it is open, the grease washes out within a few wet weeks and what replaces it is an abrasive paste. The joint then wears at a rate that has nothing to do with its mileage, so one that was good for another sixty thousand miles can develop measurable play over a single winter. A worn ball joint is a major defect of its own, makes the car wander under braking, chews the inner edge of the tyre, and at its worst separates and drops the wheel out from under the corner. The choice is between the price of the joint now and the price of the joint plus a tyre later, and there is no version of this where waiting is cheaper.

Common questions

Is a missing suspension dust cover an MOT failure?
Yes. A suspension joint dust cover that is missing, or damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt, is a major defect and a failure, whether or not the joint underneath has any play in it. A cover that is severely deteriorated but still keeping dirt out is only a minor defect, so the car passes with that recorded.
Why does a torn dust cover matter if the ball joint is still fine?
Because the cover is the only thing keeping the joint fine. It holds a small charge of grease around a hardened ball and socket and keeps water, salt and grit out. Once it is open the grease washes away within a few wet weeks and an abrasive paste takes its place, so a joint good for another sixty thousand miles can wear measurably in a single winter.
Can a suspension dust cover be replaced on its own?
Sometimes. At the rear, on older cars, and on anything with a bolt-in joint, a cover or a separate ball joint is available for £8 to £40 and takes about an hour. On most modern front suspensions the joint is sealed for life and integral to the lower arm, so the honest repair is a complete arm plus a four-wheel alignment.
How can I check my suspension dust covers before an MOT?
Turn the steering to full lock, shine a torch at the outer end of the lower arm and look at the rubber cap on the ball joint. You are looking for one that is split, collapsed or absent, or for grease weeping down the housing. It takes five minutes a side and is worth doing each autumn, before the salt goes down.
How much does it cost to fix a missing suspension dust cover?
Between £90 and £280. Where a cover or ball joint is sold separately the part is £8 to £40 and the job about an hour, so £90 to £150 fitted. Where the joint is integral to the lower arm, expect a complete arm at £45 to £120 in parts with an hour and a half of labour and £40 to £70 for alignment, landing at £180 to £280.

Cars this happens to most

Of every model with at least 2,000 tests in the DVSA data, these record suspension joint dust cover missing or split on the largest share of their MOTs. Across all of them the typical rate is 1.8% of tests.

  1. 1,888 times in 9,411 tests

  2. 1,127 times in 8,184 tests

  3. 863 times in 6,685 tests

  4. 2,838 times in 23,316 tests

  5. 25,777 times in 254,046 tests

  6. 825 times in 8,769 tests

  7. 1,477 times in 16,457 tests

  8. 891 times in 10,826 tests

A high rate here is a property of the fleet as much as the car: these models skew old, and almost everything fails more with age. It is a reason to check the item on a used example, not proof the model is badly built. Models with fewer than 2,000 tests are left out because a rate drawn from a few hundred cars moves too much to rank.

Pass rates for every make and model

Warning lights behind this

This defect is what a tester writes down. What you see from the driver’s seat is a symbol, and it is worth checking which one, because manufacturers reuse the same shape for more than one system.

This is general guidance, not a diagnosis. The severity DVSA records depends on the specific fault found, so the same item can appear as an advisory on one test and a failure on another. Ask a qualified tester or mechanic to inspect the vehicle.

Has this been recorded on your car?

Check the full MOT history for any UK registration.

Spaces are optional

Other common defects