Model reliability file
Audi Q4 E-Tron MOT pass rate & common failures
From 10,679 recorded MOT tests of the Audi Q4 E-Tron, published by DVSA.
Data updated
Quick answer
Across 10,679 MOT tests, 87.7% of Audi Q4 E-Tron tests ended in a pass. This figure is not adjusted for age or mileage, so it is not a reliability ranking: the Audi Q4 E-Tron fleet does not yet cover a wide enough spread of ages and distances to compare it fairly against other models. Its most commonly recorded failure is tyre seriously damaged, which appears in 54.4% of failed tests. Cars of this model average 35,039 miles on the odometer when tested.
At a glance
Recorded pass rate
We are not publishing a ranking for the Q4 E-Tron. The examples tested do not cover a wide enough spread of ages and mileages to compare it fairly, and an unadjusted pass rate mostly sorts models by how recently they were bought rather than how well they were built. The failure and advisory patterns below come from the same 10,679 tests and are worth reading on their own terms.
DVSA recorded wording
Most common failure items
Share of failed Audi Q4 E-Tron tests in which each item was recorded. One failed test often lists several items, so these do not sum to 100%.
- 1.A tyre seriously damaged54.4%
637 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 2.A tyre cords visible or damaged42.7%
501 occurrencesTyre ply or cord exposed, or the casing separating explained
- 3.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements21.8%
255 occurrencesTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 4.Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen4.9%
57 occurrencesWiper or washer not working properly explained
- 5.Tyres on the same axle or on twin wheels are different sizes3.2%
38 occurrencesTyres of different sizes or construction on the same axle explained
- 6.An SRS malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) indicates a system malfunction3.0%
35 occurrencesAirbag warning lamp on, or airbag missing explained
- 7.A tyre seriously damaged2.9%
34 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 8.Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements2.3%
27 occurrencesRegistration plate missing, insecure or illegible explained
- 9.A tyre seriously damaged2.0%
24 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 10.The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements2.0%
24 occurrencesHeadlamp aim incorrect explained
Warnings without a failure
Most common advisories
Share of all Audi Q4 E-Tron tests carrying each advisory. The denominator differs from the failure list above because an advisory can be issued on a car that passed.
- 1.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements37.6%
4,015 testsTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 2.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements7.5%
- 3.Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt4.3%
463 tests
- 4.Nail in tyre3.4%
366 tests
- 5.A tyre seriously damaged3.2%
- 6.A tyre seriously damaged2.9%
- 7.Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured1.5%
- 8.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn1.4%
147 testsSuspension arm bush worn explained
What gets tested
The Q4 E-Tron fleet
- Average mileage recorded at test
- 35,039
- Fuel mix of tested cars
- Electric100.0%
Across examples of every age, so this is a description of the fleet rather than an annual figure.
Trim names grouped into this model (18)
Recorded exactly as DVSA holds them. Trim-level names are rolled up so one model is not split across a dozen thin pages.
- Q4 E-TRON BLACK EDITION 40
- Q4 E-TRON EDITION 1 35
- Q4 E-TRON EDITION 1 40
- Q4 E-TRON EDITION 1 50 QUATTRO
- Q4 E-TRON S LINE 35
- Q4 E-TRON S LINE 40
- Q4 E-TRON S LINE 45
- Q4 E-TRON S LINE 50 QUATTRO
- Q4 E-TRON S LINE LAUNCH ED 40
- Q4 E-TRON SPORT 35
- Q4 E-TRON SPORT 40
- Q4 E-TRON SPORT 45
- Q4 E-TRON SPORT 45 QUATTRO
- Q4 E-TRON SPORT 50 QUATTRO
- Q4 E-TRON SPORTBACK S LINE 40
- Q4 E-TRON VORSPRUNG 35
- Q4 E-TRON VORSPRUNG 40
- Q4 E-TRON VORSPRUNG 50 QUATTRO
Check a specific Audi Q4 E-Tron
A model average tells you the pattern. Its own MOT record tells you the car.
Compare within the range
Other Audi models
Common questions
- How reliable is the Audi Q4 E-Tron compared with other cars?
- We do not publish a comparison for the Audi Q4 E-Tron, because the cars of this model that have been tested do not cover a wide enough range of ages and mileages. Its raw pass rate is 87.7% across 10,679 tests, but comparing a raw rate between models mostly ranks them by how new they are rather than how good they are. The failure and advisory patterns further down the page are still drawn from real tests and are worth reading.
- What is the most common MOT failure on a Audi Q4 E-Tron?
- The item recorded most often is "A tyre seriously damaged", which appears in 54.4% of failed Audi Q4 E-Tron tests. Because one failed test can list several items, these shares do not add up to 100%.
- What do testers most often warn about on a Audi Q4 E-Tron?
- The most common advisory is "Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements", noted on 37.6% of all Audi Q4 E-Tron tests. An advisory is not a failure: it flags something that will likely need attention before the next test.
- What mileage does a Audi Q4 E-Tron usually have at its MOT?
- The average odometer reading recorded at test is 35,039 miles. This is the mileage across all tested examples of every age, not an annual figure, so treat it as a description of the fleet rather than a target for one car.
How this was worked out
Method and limits
Figures come from the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, published under the Open Government Licence. Only class 4 initial tests are counted: retests are excluded so a car appears once, and abandoned tests are excluded entirely. No adjusted rate is shown because this model's tested examples do not cover enough of the national age and mileage range for standardisation to mean anything.
An MOT measures whether a car met a legal standard on the day. It is not a breakdown record, a service history or a running-cost estimate, and a pass rate is a property of a fleet rather than a prediction about one car.
Further reading