Model reliability file
Nissan E-NV200 MOT pass rate & common failures
From 6,225 recorded MOT tests of the Nissan E-NV200, published by DVSA.
Data updated
Quick answer
Across 6,225 MOT tests, 74.3% of Nissan E-NV200 tests ended in a pass. This figure is not adjusted for age or mileage, so it is not a reliability ranking: the Nissan E-NV200 fleet does not yet cover a wide enough spread of ages and distances to compare it fairly against other models. Its most commonly recorded failure is wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, which appears in 22.0% of failed tests. Cars of this model average 36,529 miles on the odometer when tested.
At a glance
Recorded pass rate
We are not publishing a ranking for the E-NV200. The examples tested do not cover a wide enough spread of ages and mileages to compare it fairly, and an unadjusted pass rate mostly sorts models by how recently they were bought rather than how well they were built. The failure and advisory patterns below come from the same 6,225 tests and are worth reading on their own terms.
DVSA recorded wording
Most common failure items
Share of failed Nissan E-NV200 tests in which each item was recorded. One failed test often lists several items, so these do not sum to 100%.
- 1.Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen22.0%
268 occurrencesWiper or washer not working properly explained
- 2.A tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative15.6%
190 occurrencesTyre pressure monitoring system inoperative explained
- 3.A tyre seriously damaged15.5%
189 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 4.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements14.9%
182 occurrencesTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 5.A tyre cords visible or damaged13.3%
162 occurrencesTyre ply or cord exposed, or the casing separating explained
- 6.A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning8.7%
106 occurrencesLamp not working explained
- 7.A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning6.9%
84 occurrencesLamp not working explained
- 8.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn6.4%
78 occurrencesSuspension arm bush worn explained
- 9.A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm5.0%
61 occurrencesBrake drum or shoe worn or contaminated explained
- 10.Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning5.0%
61 occurrencesStop lamp not working explained
Warnings without a failure
Most common advisories
Share of all Nissan E-NV200 tests carrying each advisory. The denominator differs from the failure list above because an advisory can be issued on a car that passed.
- 1.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements23.9%
1,488 testsTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 2.Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured13.2%
- 3.A tyre seriously damaged6.5%
- 4.A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm3.9%
- 5.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements3.7%
- 6.Nail in tyre2.9%
183 tests
- 7.A tyre seriously damaged2.6%
- 8.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn2.5%
154 testsSuspension arm bush worn explained
What gets tested
The E-NV200 fleet
- Average mileage recorded at test
- 36,529
- Fuel mix of tested cars
- Electric99.9%
Across examples of every age, so this is a description of the fleet rather than an annual figure.
Check a specific Nissan E-NV200
A model average tells you the pattern. Its own MOT record tells you the car.
Compare within the range
Other Nissan models
- Nissan Qashqai — 67.4% adjusted
- Nissan Juke — 66.5% adjusted
- Nissan Micra — 63.8% adjusted
- Nissan Note — 65.9% adjusted
- Nissan X-Trail — 70.5% adjusted
- Nissan Navara — 68.6% adjusted
- All Nissan models
Common questions
- How reliable is the Nissan E-NV200 compared with other cars?
- We do not publish a comparison for the Nissan E-NV200, because the cars of this model that have been tested do not cover a wide enough range of ages and mileages. Its raw pass rate is 74.3% across 6,225 tests, but comparing a raw rate between models mostly ranks them by how new they are rather than how good they are. The failure and advisory patterns further down the page are still drawn from real tests and are worth reading.
- What is the most common MOT failure on a Nissan E-NV200?
- The item recorded most often is "Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen", which appears in 22.0% of failed Nissan E-NV200 tests. Because one failed test can list several items, these shares do not add up to 100%.
- What do testers most often warn about on a Nissan E-NV200?
- The most common advisory is "Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements", noted on 23.9% of all Nissan E-NV200 tests. An advisory is not a failure: it flags something that will likely need attention before the next test.
- What mileage does a Nissan E-NV200 usually have at its MOT?
- The average odometer reading recorded at test is 36,529 miles. This is the mileage across all tested examples of every age, not an annual figure, so treat it as a description of the fleet rather than a target for one car.
How this was worked out
Method and limits
Figures come from the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, published under the Open Government Licence. Only class 4 initial tests are counted: retests are excluded so a car appears once, and abandoned tests are excluded entirely. No adjusted rate is shown because this model's tested examples do not cover enough of the national age and mileage range for standardisation to mean anything.
An MOT measures whether a car met a legal standard on the day. It is not a breakdown record, a service history or a running-cost estimate, and a pass rate is a property of a fleet rather than a prediction about one car.
Further reading