Model reliability file
Suzuki Alto MOT pass rate & common failures
From 45,471 recorded MOT tests of the Suzuki Alto, published by DVSA.
Data updated
Quick answer
The Suzuki Alto passes 58.8% of MOT tests once results are adjusted for the age and mileage of the cars tested, against a national average of 72.3%. That is well below average. Based on 45,471 tests. Its most commonly recorded failure is brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, which appears in 20.8% of failed tests. Cars of this model average 62,265 miles on the odometer when tested.
At a glance
Pass rate, adjusted for age and mileage
The Alto is 13.5 percentage points below the national pass rate once age and mileage are accounted for, which is well below average. The unadjusted figure is 64.7%; the difference is what the age and mileage of this model’s fleet was hiding.
DVSA recorded wording
Most common failure items
Share of failed Suzuki Alto tests in which each item was recorded. One failed test often lists several items, so these do not sum to 100%.
- 1.Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded20.8%
2,452 occurrencesBrake pipe corroded explained
- 2.Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning16.4%
1,939 occurrencesStop lamp not working explained
- 3.Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen14.2%
1,673 occurrencesWiper or washer not working properly explained
- 4.A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning13.9%
1,636 occurrencesLamp not working explained
- 5.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements13.4%
1,584 occurrencesTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 6.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn11.3%
1,337 occurrencesSuspension arm bush worn explained
- 7.A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc7.2%
855 occurrencesDriveshaft CV joint gaiter split or missing explained
- 8.A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc6.4%
757 occurrencesSuspension joint dust cover missing or split explained
- 9.Audible warning inoperative6.1%
719 occurrencesHorn not working, or of the wrong type explained
- 10.A wheel bearing excessively rough6.0%
712 occurrencesWheel bearing has excessive play or is rough explained
Warnings without a failure
Most common advisories
Share of all Suzuki Alto tests carrying each advisory. The denominator differs from the failure list above because an advisory can be issued on a car that passed.
- 1.Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded33.0%
15,008 testsBrake pipe corroded explained
- 2.A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened25.2%
11,460 testsRoad spring broken or fractured explained
- 3.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn23.6%
10,732 testsSuspension arm bush worn explained
- 4.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements23.1%
10,500 testsTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 5.A tyre seriously damaged17.7%
8,043 testsTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 6.Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured8.7%
3,936 testsBrake disc worn, pitted or scored explained
- 7.A suspension component excessively damaged or corroded7.3%
3,298 testsSuspension mounting corroded or insecure explained
- 8.A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm4.9%
2,244 testsBrake drum or shoe worn or contaminated explained
How wear changes the picture
Pass rate by vehicle age
Bands holding too few tests to be meaningful are omitted rather than shown as a rate.
What gets tested
The Alto fleet
- Average mileage recorded at test
- 62,265
- Fuel mix of tested cars
- Petrol100.0%
Across examples of every age, so this is a description of the fleet rather than an annual figure.
Trim names grouped into this model (5)
Recorded exactly as DVSA holds them. Trim-level names are rolled up so one model is not split across a dozen thin pages.
- ALTO PLAY
- ALTO SZ3
- ALTO SZ4
- ALTO TURBO RS
- ALTO TURBO RS WORKS
Check a specific Suzuki Alto
A model average tells you the pattern. Its own MOT record tells you the car.
Compare within the range
Other Suzuki models
- Suzuki Swift — 70.4% adjusted
- Suzuki Vitara — 76.2% adjusted
- Suzuki SX4 — 70.7% adjusted
- Suzuki Ignis — 73.5% adjusted
- Suzuki Celerio — 82.9% unadjusted
- Suzuki Jimny — 73.0% adjusted
- All Suzuki models
Similar test volumes
Compare against other makes
- Volkswagen Scirocco — 72.2% adjusted, ranked 147
- Kia Venga — 64.3% adjusted, ranked 227
- Citroen Dispatch — 62.0% adjusted, ranked 246
- Smart (mcc) Fortwo — 68.0% adjusted, ranked 196
Common questions
- Is the Suzuki Alto reliable?
- On MOT evidence the Suzuki Alto is well below average. It passes 58.8% of tests once age and mileage are accounted for, against a national average of 72.3%. That figure covers 61% of the national age and mileage range, which is enough to quote but not to rank. This measures how often the car meets the MOT standard, not how often it breaks down or what a repair costs.
- What is the most common MOT failure on a Suzuki Alto?
- The item recorded most often is "Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded", which appears in 20.8% of failed Suzuki Alto tests. Because one failed test can list several items, these shares do not add up to 100%.
- What do testers most often warn about on a Suzuki Alto?
- The most common advisory is "Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded", noted on 33.0% of all Suzuki Alto tests. An advisory is not a failure: it flags something that will likely need attention before the next test.
- What mileage does a Suzuki Alto usually have at its MOT?
- The average odometer reading recorded at test is 62,265 miles. This is the mileage across all tested examples of every age, not an annual figure, so treat it as a description of the fleet rather than a target for one car.
- Does a Suzuki Alto get harder to pass as it ages?
- Yes. At 9 to 11 years old, 68.3% of Suzuki Alto tests pass. By fifteen years or more, that falls to 58.4%. Nearly every model follows this pattern, which is why comparing raw pass rates between models is misleading unless age is accounted for.
How this was worked out
Method and limits
Figures come from the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, published under the Open Government Licence. Only class 4 initial tests are counted: retests are excluded so a car appears once, and abandoned tests are excluded entirely. The adjusted rate is directly standardised across twenty-five age and mileage bands and reweighted onto the national distribution, so this model is compared against cars that have lived a similar life rather than against a younger or lighter-used fleet.
An MOT measures whether a car met a legal standard on the day. It is not a breakdown record, a service history or a running-cost estimate, and a pass rate is a property of a fleet rather than a prediction about one car.
Further reading