Model reliability file
Mitsubishi Lancer MOT pass rate & common failures
From 8,750 recorded MOT tests of the Mitsubishi Lancer, published by DVSA.
Data updated
Quick answer
Across 8,750 MOT tests, 67.4% of Mitsubishi Lancer tests ended in a pass. This figure is not adjusted for age or mileage, so it is not a reliability ranking: the Mitsubishi Lancer fleet does not yet cover a wide enough spread of ages and distances to compare it fairly against other models. Its most commonly recorded failure is steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play, which appears in 19.4% of failed tests. Cars of this model average 92,915 miles on the odometer when tested.
At a glance
Recorded pass rate
We are not publishing a ranking for the Lancer. The examples tested do not cover a wide enough spread of ages and mileages to compare it fairly, and an unadjusted pass rate mostly sorts models by how recently they were bought rather than how well they were built. The failure and advisory patterns below come from the same 8,750 tests and are worth reading on their own terms.
DVSA recorded wording
Most common failure items
Share of failed Mitsubishi Lancer tests in which each item was recorded. One failed test often lists several items, so these do not sum to 100%.
- 1.A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play19.4%
451 occurrencesBall joint worn explained
- 2.A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning18.2%
423 occurrencesLamp not working explained
- 3.Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded13.5%
314 occurrencesBrake pipe corroded explained
- 4.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn11.1%
259 occurrencesSuspension arm bush worn explained
- 5.Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning9.5%
222 occurrencesStop lamp not working explained
- 6.The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired8.6%
200 occurrencesSuspension mounting corroded or insecure explained
- 7.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements8.6%
200 occurrencesTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 8.The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements8.5%
198 occurrencesHeadlamp aim incorrect explained
- 9.Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen8.3%
194 occurrencesWiper or washer not working properly explained
- 10.Exhaust system leaking or insecure7.9%
183 occurrencesExhaust leaking or insecure explained
Warnings without a failure
Most common advisories
Share of all Mitsubishi Lancer tests carrying each advisory. The denominator differs from the failure list above because an advisory can be issued on a car that passed.
- 1.Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded21.4%
1,869 testsBrake pipe corroded explained
- 2.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements18.3%
1,604 testsTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 3.A suspension component excessively damaged or corroded13.6%
1,187 testsSuspension mounting corroded or insecure explained
- 4.Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured12.0%
1,052 testsBrake disc worn, pitted or scored explained
- 5.A tyre seriously damaged10.2%
- 6.A suspension component excessively damaged or corroded8.6%
- 7.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn8.6%
749 testsSuspension arm bush worn explained
- 8.A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm7.2%
The rest of the record
Everything else recorded on the Mitsubishi Lancer
The 14 other defects testers recorded on this model, beyond the most common listed above. Each links to what it means and what it takes to put right.
- Road spring broken or fractured7.0%
- Emissions above the permitted limit5.3%
- Brake system warning lamp on, or not working5.2%
- Suspension joint dust cover missing or split4.5%
- Lamp of the wrong colour, position or intensity4.5%
- Brake binding or imbalanced across an axle4.4%
- Tyre ply or cord exposed, or the casing separating3.9%
- Shock absorber defective3.9%
- Engine management light on, or not working3.0%
- Registration plate missing, insecure or illegible2.6%
- Driveshaft CV joint gaiter split or missing2.6%
- Steering rack gaiter split, damaged or missing2.6%
- Corrosion in a structural area2.5%
- Brake hose deteriorated, damaged or chafing2.4%
Known faults
Mitsubishi Lancer common problems, by part and by year
The same failure record read the way a buyer asks the question: which parts wear out on a Lancer, when they start, and how each registration year compares — including the steps that mark a generation change.
How wear changes the picture
Lancer pass rate by age and registration year
How often the Mitsubishi Lancer passes at each age, with the years those cars were first registered. Tests are from 2025, so a car aged 6 to 8 was first used in 2017–2019.
Read this as an age curve rather than a verdict on particular model years. Nearly every car passes less often as it gets older, so a newer Lancer outscoring an older one says more about wear than about how that year’s cars were built. Bands holding too few tests to be meaningful are omitted rather than shown as a rate.
What gets tested
The Lancer fleet
- Average mileage recorded at test
- 92,915
- Fuel mix of tested cars
- Petrol80.8%Diesel19.2%
Across examples of every age, so this is a description of the fleet rather than an annual figure.
Trim names grouped into this model (11)
Recorded exactly as DVSA holds them. Trim-level names are rolled up so one model is not split across a dozen thin pages.
- LANCER EVO
- LANCER EVO 3
- LANCER EVO 6 RS
- LANCER EVO 9
- LANCER EVO 9 GT
- LANCER EVO 9 MR
- LANCER EVOLUTION
- LANCER EVOLUTION 6
- LANCER EVOLUTION 7 RS
- LANCER EVOLUTION 8 MR
- LANCER EVOLUTION VIII GSR ( 260 )
Check a specific Mitsubishi Lancer
A model average tells you the pattern. Its own MOT record tells you the car.
Compare within the range
Other Mitsubishi models
- Mitsubishi L200 — 72.0% adjusted
- Mitsubishi Outlander — 73.8% adjusted
- Mitsubishi Asx — 75.0% adjusted
- Mitsubishi Shogun — 75.4% adjusted
- Mitsubishi Colt — 54.1% unadjusted
- Mitsubishi Mirage — 77.3% adjusted
- All Mitsubishi models
Common questions
- How reliable is the Mitsubishi Lancer compared with other cars?
- We do not publish a comparison for the Mitsubishi Lancer, because the cars of this model that have been tested do not cover a wide enough range of ages and mileages. Its raw pass rate is 67.4% across 8,750 tests, but comparing a raw rate between models mostly ranks them by how new they are rather than how good they are. The failure and advisory patterns further down the page are still drawn from real tests and are worth reading.
- What is the most common MOT failure on a Mitsubishi Lancer?
- The item recorded most often is "A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play", which appears in 19.4% of failed Mitsubishi Lancer tests. Because one failed test can list several items, these shares do not add up to 100%.
- What do testers most often warn about on a Mitsubishi Lancer?
- The most common advisory is "Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded", noted on 21.4% of all Mitsubishi Lancer tests. An advisory is not a failure: it flags something that will likely need attention before the next test.
- What mileage does a Mitsubishi Lancer usually have at its MOT?
- The average odometer reading recorded at test is 92,915 miles. This is the mileage across all tested examples of every age, not an annual figure, so treat it as a description of the fleet rather than a target for one car.
- Which Mitsubishi Lancer years are the most reliable?
- Going by MOT pass rate, Mitsubishi Lancer cars first registered 2017–2019 do best at 92.2%, and those registered 2010 and earlier do worst at 67.8%. But that ordering is mostly age, not build year: almost every model passes less often as it wears, so the newest cars top this list whatever they are. A specific year looking strong here means little on its own; the failure items above, and the individual car's own MOT history, tell you far more.
- Does a Mitsubishi Lancer get harder to pass as it ages?
- Yes. At 6 to 8 years old, 92.2% of Mitsubishi Lancer tests pass. By fifteen years or more, that falls to 67.8%. Nearly every model follows this pattern, which is why comparing raw pass rates between models is misleading unless age is accounted for.
- Are most Mitsubishi Lancer models petrol or diesel?
- Of the Mitsubishi Lancer cars tested, 81% are petrol, 19% are diesel. Fuel type affects which items tend to fail, particularly emissions and exhaust components.
How this was worked out
Method and limits
Figures come from the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, published under the Open Government Licence. Only class 4 initial tests are counted: retests are excluded so a car appears once, and abandoned tests are excluded entirely. No adjusted rate is shown because this model's tested examples do not cover enough of the national age and mileage range for standardisation to mean anything.
An MOT measures whether a car met a legal standard on the day. It is not a breakdown record, a service history or a running-cost estimate, and a pass rate is a property of a fleet rather than a prediction about one car.
Further reading