The MOT Files

Known faults, from the test record

Hyundai Kona common problems

What fails on the Hyundai Kona at MOT, which parts are behind it, and how each model year compares. From 62,765 DVSA test records.

Data updated

Quick answer

The Hyundai Kona's most common MOT problems are tyres, wiper blades and washers, brake pads and shoes, recorded in 68.6%, 24.5% and 11.7% of failed tests respectively. By model year, 2019 cars pass most often (86.6%) and 2020 cars least (85.8%), though most of that gap is age. Every figure here is what testers recorded, not what owners reported.

A “common problems” list is usually a forum thread: whoever had the worst day writes the longest post. This one is built the other way, from every Hyundai Kona that took an MOT last year and what the tester wrote down. It cannot see breakdowns, electrical gremlins or a gearbox that hunts, because the test does not check those. What it can see, it sees across 62,765 cars.

By component

What wears out on a Kona

Failure items grouped by the part behind them, with the share of failed Hyundai Kona tests recording each. A part can carry several DVSA wordings; they are listed beneath. One failed test often lists several items, so shares do not sum to 100%.

  1. 1.Tyres

    68.6% of failed tests

    Tread wears with every mile and sidewalls age and take kerb damage; the legal minimum is 1.6 mm across the central three-quarters.

    • “A tyre seriously damaged” — explained24.7%
    • “Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements” — explained18.2%
    • “A tyre cords visible or damaged” — explained14.8%
    • “A tyre seriously damaged” — explained4.2%

    Across all cars, tyres failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long tyres last

  2. 2.Wiper blades and washers

    24.5% of failed tests

    Rubber blades harden and split within a year or two; washer jets block and pumps fail.

    • “Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen” — explained19.6%
    • “Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen” — explained2.5%
    • “Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen” — explained2.4%

    Across all cars, wiper blades and washers failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long wiper blades and washers last

  3. 3.Brake pads and shoes

    11.7% of failed tests

    Friction material wears with use; the MOT limit is 1.5 mm and a pad that thin is close to metal on metal.

    • “a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm” — explained11.0%
    • “Brake lining or pad worn down to wear indicator” — explained0.7%

    Across all cars, brake pads and shoes failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long brake pads and shoes last

  4. 4.Suspension bushes

    8.6% of failed tests

    Rubber bushes in arms and links perish and split with age and load; the most recorded suspension item on the test.

    • “A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn” — explained7.6%
    • “A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc” — explained1.0%

    Across all cars, suspension bushes failures climb 20-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long suspension bushes last

  5. 5.Headlamp aim

    4.9% of failed tests

    Aim drifts with sagging suspension, a knocked lamp or a botched bulb change; adjustment, not a part.

    • “The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements” — explained2.1%
    • “The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements” — explained1.2%
    • “Headlamp aim unable to be tested” — explained0.9%
    • “The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements” — explained0.7%

  6. 6.Bulbs and lamps

    4.4% of failed tests

    Filament bulbs simply expire; the cheapest and most avoidable failure on the test, and one of the most recorded.

    • “A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED” — explained2.3%
    • “An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning” — explained0.8%
    • “An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning” — explained0.7%
    • “A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED” — explained0.6%

    Across all cars, bulbs and lamps failures climb 15-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long bulbs and lamps last

  7. 7.Brake discs

    4.2% of failed tests

    Discs thin with each pad set and pit or corrode when lightly used; failure is for significant wear, fracture or insecurity, advisory for surface condition.

    • “Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn” — explained2.1%
    • “Excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution.” — explained1.5%
    • “Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured” — explained0.7%

    Across all cars, brake discs failures climb 3-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 12–14 years. How long brake discs last

  8. 8.Parking brake

    4.1% of failed tests

    Cables stretch and seize, rear shoes and adjusters wear; efficiency is measured on the roller tester against the vehicle's weight.

    • “Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value” — explained2.0%
    • “Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement” — explained1.5%
    • “Parking brake inoperative on one side” — explained0.6%

By registration year

Kona problems by year

MOT pass rate for Hyundai Kona cars by the year they were first registered, from years with at least 1,000 tests. Every car in a row is the same age, so the rate is raw. Neighbouring years differ by a year of wear — a step of a point or two is age. No single step here is large enough to point at a generation change.

201886%
201987%+0.7
202086%−0.9
202186%+0.4
202286%+0.3

Last column: change on the previous year, in points. Years registered within the last three years have not yet been tested and are not shown.

Before it fails

What testers warn Kona owners about

Advisories are the same parts a year or two earlier. Share of all Hyundai Kona tests carrying an advisory for each.

Go deeper

The rest of the Kona file

Common questions

What are the most common problems with a Hyundai Kona?
Going by what fails the MOT, tyres (recorded in 68.6% of failed tests), wiper blades and washers (recorded in 24.5% of failed tests), and brake pads and shoes (recorded in 11.7% of failed tests). These are the items testers actually record across 62,765 tests, not reports from owners, so they describe what goes wrong at the point where it has to be fixed.
Which Hyundai Kona year is the most reliable?
By MOT pass rate, Hyundai Kona cars registered in 2019 do best at 86.6% and 2020 cars do worst at 85.8%. Most of that ordering is simply age — newer cars pass more — so read the year table for steps larger than a couple of points between neighbouring years; those mark a change in the cars rather than the calendar.
Is the Hyundai Kona reliable?
The Hyundai Kona passes 86.3% of MOTs unadjusted; its fleet is too narrow in age or mileage for a fair national comparison. An MOT measures roadworthiness on the day rather than breakdowns or running costs, so this is a reliability measure in the narrow sense: how often the car meets the legal standard, and what stops it.
What should I check when buying a used Hyundai Kona?
Start with what fails most: tyres, wiper blades and washers, brake pads and shoes. Then read the car's own MOT history for advisories carried year to year without repair — the model tells you what to expect, the history tells you whether this owner dealt with it.

Analysis built from DVSA data of