Model reliability file
Peugeot Traveller MOT pass rate & common failures
From 1,599 recorded MOT tests of the Peugeot Traveller, published by DVSA.
Data updated
Quick answer
Across 1,599 MOT tests, 76.2% of Peugeot Traveller tests ended in a pass. This figure is not adjusted for age or mileage, so it is not a reliability ranking: the Peugeot Traveller fleet does not yet cover a wide enough spread of ages and distances to compare it fairly against other models. Its most commonly recorded failure is transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, which appears in 21.3% of failed tests. Cars of this model average 62,204 miles on the odometer when tested.
At a glance
Recorded pass rate
We are not publishing a ranking for the Traveller. The examples tested do not cover a wide enough spread of ages and mileages to compare it fairly, and an unadjusted pass rate mostly sorts models by how recently they were bought rather than how well they were built. The failure and advisory patterns below come from the same 1,599 tests and are worth reading on their own terms.
DVSA recorded wording
Most common failure items
Share of failed Peugeot Traveller tests in which each item was recorded. One failed test often lists several items, so these do not sum to 100%.
- 1.A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc21.3%
64 occurrencesDriveshaft CV joint gaiter split or missing explained
- 2.Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen14.3%
43 occurrencesWiper or washer not working properly explained
- 3.A tyre cords visible or damaged13.0%
39 occurrencesTyre ply or cord exposed, or the casing separating explained
- 4.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements12.7%
38 occurrencesTyre worn close to the legal limit explained
- 5.A tyre seriously damaged11.7%
35 occurrencesTyre damaged or deteriorated explained
- 6.A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm10.0%
30 occurrencesBrake drum or shoe worn or contaminated explained
- 7.A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps7.3%
22 occurrencesLamp not working explained
- 8.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn4.3%
13 occurrencesSuspension arm bush worn explained
- 9.A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.3%
13 occurrencesLamp not working explained
- 10.Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction3.7%
11 occurrencesEngine management light on, or not working explained
Warnings without a failure
Most common advisories
Share of all Peugeot Traveller tests carrying each advisory. The denominator differs from the failure list above because an advisory can be issued on a car that passed.
- 1.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements26.5%
- 2.Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fractured15.8%
- 3.A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm12.6%
- 4.A tyre seriously damaged7.1%
- 5.Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn5.9%
- 6.Fluid leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users4.9%
79 tests
- 7.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements4.6%
- 8.Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt4.1%
66 tests
What gets tested
The Traveller fleet
- Average mileage recorded at test
- 62,204
- Fuel mix of tested cars
- Diesel100.0%
Across examples of every age, so this is a description of the fleet rather than an annual figure.
Trim names grouped into this model (11)
Recorded exactly as DVSA holds them. Trim-level names are rolled up so one model is not split across a dozen thin pages.
- TRAVELLER ACTIVE BLUEHDI
- TRAVELLER ACTIVE BLUEHDI S/S
- TRAVELLER ACTIVE BLUEHDI S/S A
- TRAVELLER ALLURE BLUEHDI
- TRAVELLER ALLURE BLUEHDI AUTO
- TRAVELLER ALLURE BLUEHDI S/S
- TRAVELLER ALLURE BLUEHDI S/S A
- TRAVELLER ALLURE L BHDI S/S A
- TRAVELLER BUSINESS BLUEHDI
- TRAVELLER BUSINESS BLUEHDI S/S
- TRAVELLER MOTORHOME
Check a specific Peugeot Traveller
A model average tells you the pattern. Its own MOT record tells you the car.
Compare within the range
Other Peugeot models
- Peugeot 208 — 68.4% adjusted
- Peugeot Partner — 65.1% adjusted
- Peugeot 2008 — 69.0% adjusted
- Peugeot 3008 — 65.6% adjusted
- Peugeot 308 — 67.5% adjusted
- Peugeot 207 — 50.2% unadjusted
- All Peugeot models
Common questions
- How reliable is the Peugeot Traveller compared with other cars?
- We do not publish a comparison for the Peugeot Traveller, because the cars of this model that have been tested do not cover a wide enough range of ages and mileages. Its raw pass rate is 76.2% across 1,599 tests, but comparing a raw rate between models mostly ranks them by how new they are rather than how good they are. The failure and advisory patterns further down the page are still drawn from real tests and are worth reading.
- What is the most common MOT failure on a Peugeot Traveller?
- The item recorded most often is "A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc", which appears in 21.3% of failed Peugeot Traveller tests. Because one failed test can list several items, these shares do not add up to 100%.
- What do testers most often warn about on a Peugeot Traveller?
- The most common advisory is "Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements", noted on 26.5% of all Peugeot Traveller tests. An advisory is not a failure: it flags something that will likely need attention before the next test.
- What mileage does a Peugeot Traveller usually have at its MOT?
- The average odometer reading recorded at test is 62,204 miles. This is the mileage across all tested examples of every age, not an annual figure, so treat it as a description of the fleet rather than a target for one car.
How this was worked out
Method and limits
Figures come from the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, published under the Open Government Licence. Only class 4 initial tests are counted: retests are excluded so a car appears once, and abandoned tests are excluded entirely. No adjusted rate is shown because this model's tested examples do not cover enough of the national age and mileage range for standardisation to mean anything.
An MOT measures whether a car met a legal standard on the day. It is not a breakdown record, a service history or a running-cost estimate, and a pass rate is a property of a fleet rather than a prediction about one car.
Further reading