The MOT Files

Known faults, from the test record

Peugeot 208 common problems

What fails on the Peugeot 208 at MOT, which parts are behind it, and how each model year compares. From 219,721 DVSA test records.

Data updated

Quick answer

The Peugeot 208's most common MOT problems are tyres, bulbs and lamps, suspension bushes, recorded in 28.1%, 26.4% and 20.7% of failed tests respectively. By model year, 2022 cars pass most often (87.5%) and 2012 cars least (58.2%), though most of that gap is age. Every figure here is what testers recorded, not what owners reported.

A “common problems” list is usually a forum thread: whoever had the worst day writes the longest post. This one is built the other way, from every Peugeot 208 that took an MOT last year and what the tester wrote down. It cannot see breakdowns, electrical gremlins or a gearbox that hunts, because the test does not check those. What it can see, it sees across 219,721 cars.

By component

What wears out on a 208

Failure items grouped by the part behind them, with the share of failed Peugeot 208 tests recording each. A part can carry several DVSA wordings; they are listed beneath. One failed test often lists several items, so shares do not sum to 100%.

  1. 1.Tyres

    28.1% of failed tests

    Tread wears with every mile and sidewalls age and take kerb damage; the legal minimum is 1.6 mm across the central three-quarters.

    • Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirementsexplained11.0%
    • A tyre seriously damagedexplained7.4%
    • A tyre seriously damagedexplained4.9%
    • A tyre cords visible or damagedexplained4.9%

    Across all cars, tyres failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long tyres last

  2. 2.Bulbs and lamps

    26.4% of failed tests

    Filament bulbs simply expire; the cheapest and most avoidable failure on the test, and one of the most recorded.

    • A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LEDexplained8.7%
    • A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lampsexplained8.5%
    • Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioningexplained4.6%
    • A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioningexplained2.7%

    Across all cars, bulbs and lamps failures climb 15-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long bulbs and lamps last

  3. 3.Suspension bushes

    20.7% of failed tests

    Rubber bushes in arms and links perish and split with age and load; the most recorded suspension item on the test.

    • A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornexplained7.0%
    • A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornexplained6.7%
    • A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etcexplained3.0%
    • A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornexplained2.6%

    Across all cars, suspension bushes failures climb 20-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long suspension bushes last

  4. 4.Catalytic converter and emissions

    19.5% of failed tests

    Catalysts degrade with age and misfires; a failed emissions reading is usually the catalyst, a lambda sensor or a tired engine.

    • Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturerexplained10.2%
    • Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limitsexplained5.1%
    • Emissions levels exceed default limitsexplained2.7%
    • Emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limitsexplained1.5%
  5. 5.Driveshaft gaiters

    17.1% of failed tests

    The rubber boot over each CV joint splits with age and flexing, then throws grease and lets grit destroy the joint.

    • A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etcexplained17.1%

    Across all cars, driveshaft gaiters failures climb 21-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long driveshaft gaiters last

  6. 6.Exhaust system

    13.7% of failed tests

    Silencers and pipes rust through from the inside on short-trip cars; rubber hangers perish.

    • Exhaust system leaking or insecureexplained6.3%
    • Exhaust system leaking or insecureexplained5.7%
    • An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levelsexplained1.7%

    Across all cars, exhaust system failures climb 104-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long exhaust system last

  7. 7.Wiper blades and washers

    12.9% of failed tests

    Rubber blades harden and split within a year or two; washer jets block and pumps fail.

    • Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreenexplained7.2%
    • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreenexplained3.0%
    • Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreenexplained2.6%

    Across all cars, wiper blades and washers failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long wiper blades and washers last

  8. 8.Brake discs

    8.7% of failed tests

    Discs thin with each pad set and pit or corrode when lightly used; failure is for significant wear, fracture or insecurity, advisory for surface condition.

    • Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously wornexplained5.2%
    • Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fracturedexplained1.9%
    • Excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution.explained1.5%

    Across all cars, brake discs failures climb 3-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 12–14 years. How long brake discs last

By registration year

208 problems by year

MOT pass rate for Peugeot 208 cars by the year they were first registered, from years with at least 1,000 tests. Every car in a row is the same age, so the rate is raw. Neighbouring years differ by a year of wear — a step of a point or two is age. The step at 2015, up 5.9 points, is larger than wear explains and most likely marks a change in the cars themselves.

201258%
201360%+1.4
201462%+2.8
201568%+5.9
201670%+2.0
201771%+0.3
201873%+2.5
201977%+4.3
202081%+3.6
202183%+1.6
202287%+4.9

Last column: change on the previous year, in points. Years registered within the last three years have not yet been tested and are not shown.

Before it fails

What testers warn 208 owners about

Advisories are the same parts a year or two earlier. Share of all Peugeot 208 tests carrying an advisory for each.

Go deeper

The rest of the 208 file

Common questions

What are the most common problems with a Peugeot 208?
Going by what fails the MOT, tyres (recorded in 28.1% of failed tests), bulbs and lamps (recorded in 26.4% of failed tests), and suspension bushes (recorded in 20.7% of failed tests). These are the items testers actually record across 219,721 tests, not reports from owners, so they describe what goes wrong at the point where it has to be fixed.
Which Peugeot 208 year is the most reliable?
By MOT pass rate, Peugeot 208 cars registered in 2022 do best at 87.5% and 2012 cars do worst at 58.2%. Most of that ordering is simply age — newer cars pass more — so read the year table for steps larger than a couple of points between neighbouring years; those mark a change in the cars rather than the calendar. The largest such step is at 2015, up 5.9 points on 2014.
Is the Peugeot 208 reliable?
Adjusted for the age and mileage of the cars tested, the Peugeot 208 passes 68.4% of MOTs against a national 72.3%. An MOT measures roadworthiness on the day rather than breakdowns or running costs, so this is a reliability measure in the narrow sense: how often the car meets the legal standard, and what stops it.
What should I check when buying a used Peugeot 208?
Start with what fails most: tyres, bulbs and lamps, suspension bushes. Then read the car's own MOT history for advisories carried year to year without repair — the model tells you what to expect, the history tells you whether this owner dealt with it.

Analysis built from DVSA data of