Mitsubishi Shogun common problems

By component

What wears out on a Shogun

Failure items grouped by the part behind them, with the share of failed Mitsubishi Shogun tests recording each. A part can carry several DVSA wordings; they are listed beneath. One failed test often lists several items, so shares do not sum to 100%.

1. 1.Suspension bushes

   39.0% of failed tests

   Rubber bushes in arms and links perish and split with age and load; the most recorded suspension item on the test.

   • “A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn” — explained12.9%
   • “A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn” — explained7.6%
   • “A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn” — explained5.0%
   • “A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn” — explained4.9%

   Across all cars, suspension bushes failures climb 20-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long suspension bushes last

2. 2.Bulbs and lamps

   23.9% of failed tests

   Filament bulbs simply expire; the cheapest and most avoidable failure on the test, and one of the most recorded.

   • “A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning” — explained10.4%
   • “Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning” — explained7.3%
   • “An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning” — explained3.2%
   • “A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps” — explained3.1%

   Across all cars, bulbs and lamps failures climb 15-fold between three and fifteen years, peaking at 15+ years. How long bulbs and lamps last

3. 3.Suspension arms and mountings

   21.9% of failed tests

   Arms bend on impact and mountings corrode into the body; a corroded mounting is a structural item and fails as one.

   • “The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired” — explained21.9%

4. 4.Body and structure

   19.5% of failed tests

   Structural corrosion within 30 cm of a seat belt, suspension or steering mounting fails; it is a disease of age, salt and wet storage.

   • “Body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point” — explained8.7%
   • “Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced” — explained6.8%
   • “Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced” — explained4.0%

5. 5.Wiper blades and washers

   15.8% of failed tests

   Rubber blades harden and split within a year or two; washer jets block and pumps fail.

   • “Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen” — explained9.0%
   • “Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen” — explained3.5%
   • “Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen” — explained3.3%

   Across all cars, wiper blades and washers failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long wiper blades and washers last

6. 6.Tyres

   13.5% of failed tests

   Tread wears with every mile and sidewalls age and take kerb damage; the legal minimum is 1.6 mm across the central three-quarters.

   • “Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements” — explained7.1%
   • “A tyre cords visible or damaged” — explained3.4%
   • “A tyre seriously damaged” — explained3.0%

   Across all cars, tyres failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long tyres last

7. 7.Brake pads and shoes

   12.8% of failed tests

   Friction material wears with use; the MOT limit is 1.5 mm and a pad that thin is close to metal on metal.

   • “a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm” — explained12.8%

   Across all cars, brake pads and shoes failures run at a similar rate at every age, because they are replaced on a cycle rather than wearing out with the car. How long brake pads and shoes last

8. 8.Headlamp aim

   12.3% of failed tests

   Aim drifts with sagging suspension, a knocked lamp or a botched bulb change; adjustment, not a part.

   • “The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements” — explained6.9%
   • “The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements” — explained3.2%
   • “The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements” — explained2.2%

By registration year

Shogun problems by year

MOT pass rate for Mitsubishi Shogun cars by the year they were first registered, from years with at least 1,000 tests. Every car in a row is the same age, so the rate is raw. Neighbouring years differ by a year of wear — a step of a point or two is age. The step at 2014, up 7.8 points, is larger than wear explains and most likely marks a change in the cars themselves.

Last column: change on the previous year, in points. Years registered within the last three years have not yet been tested and are not shown.

Before it fails

What testers warn Shogun owners about

Advisories are the same parts a year or two earlier. Share of all Mitsubishi Shogun tests carrying an advisory for each.

• Tyres29.5% of tests
• Suspension bushes25.9% of tests
• Brake pipes18.8% of tests
• Suspension arms and mountings16.9% of tests
• Brake discs15.4% of tests

Go deeper

The rest of the Shogun file

• Mitsubishi Shogun: pass rate, ranking and the full failure record
• Is a Shogun's mileage high for its age?
• Every Mitsubishi model compared
• Check a specific car's MOT history

Common questions

What are the most common problems with a Mitsubishi Shogun?

Going by what fails the MOT, suspension bushes (recorded in 39.0% of failed tests), bulbs and lamps (recorded in 23.9% of failed tests), and suspension arms and mountings (recorded in 21.9% of failed tests). These are the items testers actually record across 27,357 tests, not reports from owners, so they describe what goes wrong at the point where it has to be fixed.

Which Mitsubishi Shogun year is the most reliable?

By MOT pass rate, Mitsubishi Shogun cars registered in 2021 do best at 86.2% and 2007 cars do worst at 58.3%. Most of that ordering is simply age — newer cars pass more — so read the year table for steps larger than a couple of points between neighbouring years; those mark a change in the cars rather than the calendar. The largest such step is at 2014, up 7.8 points on 2013.

Is the Mitsubishi Shogun reliable?

Adjusted for the age and mileage of the cars tested, the Mitsubishi Shogun passes 75.4% of MOTs against a national 72.3%. An MOT measures roadworthiness on the day rather than breakdowns or running costs, so this is a reliability measure in the narrow sense: how often the car meets the legal standard, and what stops it.

What should I check when buying a used Mitsubishi Shogun?

Start with what fails most: suspension bushes, bulbs and lamps, wiper blades and washers. Then read the car's own MOT history for advisories carried year to year without repair — the model tells you what to expect, the history tells you whether this owner dealt with it.