The MOT Files

Model reliability file

Austin Mini 1000 City MOT pass rate & common failures

From 693 recorded MOT tests of the Austin Mini 1000 City, published by DVSA.

Data updated

Quick answer

Across 693 MOT tests, 70.4% of Austin Mini 1000 City tests ended in a pass. This figure is not adjusted for age or mileage, so it is not a reliability ranking: the Austin Mini 1000 City fleet does not yet cover a wide enough spread of ages and distances to compare it fairly against other models. Its most commonly recorded failure is emissions levels exceed default limits, which appears in 27.4% of failed tests. Cars of this model average 50,026 miles on the odometer when tested.

At a glance

Recorded pass rate

70.4%unadjusted, not comparable693 tests

We are not publishing a ranking for the Mini 1000 City. The examples tested do not cover a wide enough spread of ages and mileages to compare it fairly, and an unadjusted pass rate mostly sorts models by how recently they were bought rather than how well they were built. The failure and advisory patterns below come from the same 693 tests and are worth reading on their own terms.

DVSA recorded wording

Most common failure items

Share of failed Austin Mini 1000 City tests in which each item was recorded. One failed test often lists several items, so these do not sum to 100%.

  1. 1.Emissions levels exceed default limits27.4%

    51 occurrencesEmissions above the permitted limit explained

  2. 2.An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning14.5%

    27 occurrencesLamp not working explained

  3. 3.A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning14.5%

    27 occurrencesLamp not working explained

  4. 4.Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc12.4%

    23 occurrencesSteering rack gaiter split, damaged or missing explained

  5. 5.A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc10.8%

    20 occurrencesDriveshaft CV joint gaiter split or missing explained

  6. 6.Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle10.8%

    20 occurrencesBrake binding or imbalanced across an axle explained

  7. 7.The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements10.2%

    19 occurrencesHeadlamp aim incorrect explained

  8. 8.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn9.1%

    17 occurrencesSuspension arm bush worn explained

  9. 9.Service brake efficiency below minimum requirement8.6%

    16 occurrencesBraking efficiency below requirement explained

  10. 10.Emissions levels exceed default limits8.1%

    15 occurrencesEmissions above the permitted limit explained

Warnings without a failure

Most common advisories

Share of all Austin Mini 1000 City tests carrying each advisory. The denominator differs from the failure list above because an advisory can be issued on a car that passed.

  1. 1.Fluid leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users16.8%

    115 tests

  2. 2.A tyre seriously damaged9.1%

    62 testsTyre damaged or deteriorated explained

  3. 3.A wheel bearing with excessive play8.6%

    59 testsWheel bearing has excessive play or is rough explained

  4. 4.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn7.0%

    48 testsSuspension arm bush worn explained

  5. 5.Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements6.6%

    45 testsTyre worn close to the legal limit explained

  6. 6.Play in steering rack inner joint(s)5.4%

    37 tests

  7. 7.A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn5.3%

    36 testsSuspension arm bush worn explained

  8. 8.Exhaust system leaking or insecure3.7%

    25 testsExhaust leaking or insecure explained

The rest of the record

Everything else recorded on the Austin Mini 1000 City

The 20 other defects testers recorded on this model, beyond the most common listed above. Each links to what it means and what it takes to put right.

What gets tested

The Mini 1000 City fleet

Average mileage recorded at test
50,026

Across examples of every age, so this is a description of the fleet rather than an annual figure.

Fuel mix of tested cars
Petrol99.7%
Trim names grouped into this model (2)

Recorded exactly as DVSA holds them. Trim-level names are rolled up so one model is not split across a dozen thin pages.

  • MINI 1000 CITY E
  • MINI 1000 CITY E AUTO

Check a specific Austin Mini 1000 City

A model average tells you the pattern. Its own MOT record tells you the car.

Spaces are optional

Compare within the range

Other Austin models

Common questions

How reliable is the Austin Mini 1000 City compared with other cars?
We do not publish a comparison for the Austin Mini 1000 City, because the cars of this model that have been tested do not cover a wide enough range of ages and mileages. Its raw pass rate is 70.4% across 693 tests, but comparing a raw rate between models mostly ranks them by how new they are rather than how good they are. The failure and advisory patterns further down the page are still drawn from real tests and are worth reading.
What is the most common MOT failure on a Austin Mini 1000 City?
The item recorded most often is "Emissions levels exceed default limits", which appears in 27.4% of failed Austin Mini 1000 City tests. Because one failed test can list several items, these shares do not add up to 100%.
What do testers most often warn about on a Austin Mini 1000 City?
The most common advisory is "Fluid leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users", noted on 16.8% of all Austin Mini 1000 City tests. An advisory is not a failure: it flags something that will likely need attention before the next test.
What mileage does a Austin Mini 1000 City usually have at its MOT?
The average odometer reading recorded at test is 50,026 miles. This is the mileage across all tested examples of every age, not an annual figure, so treat it as a description of the fleet rather than a target for one car.

How this was worked out

Method and limits

Figures come from the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, published under the Open Government Licence. Only class 4 initial tests are counted: retests are excluded so a car appears once, and abandoned tests are excluded entirely. No adjusted rate is shown because this model's tested examples do not cover enough of the national age and mileage range for standardisation to mean anything.

An MOT measures whether a car met a legal standard on the day. It is not a breakdown record, a service history or a running-cost estimate, and a pass rate is a property of a fleet rather than a prediction about one car.

Further reading

Make sense of the numbers